Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Fiscal policy options for reducing informality in an economy with fiscal rules

Abstract

We use a dynamic general equilibrium model to examine the effect of various fiscal policies in an economy with a large informal sector. More specifically, we simulate (i) a reduction of the tax rate on personal income and social security contributions and (ii) an increase in the efforts of the tax administration to uncover shadow activities in a model, calibrated to the Bulgarian economy. While both policies encourage total economic activity and discourage shadow practices, they worsen the inequalities in the economy. Due to the application of fiscal rules in the model, the tax cut leads to a permanent increase in public debt and lower public investment, while the strengthened control over tax collection has a negative impact on employment, but, nonetheless, does not deepen inequalities as much as the tax cut.

2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:

91B50, 91B66, 91B69

Keywords

general equilibrium models, informal sector, fiscal rules, calibration for Bulgaria

Full text

Author Details

Tsvetomir Tsachev

Institute of Mathematics and Informatics
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Acad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 8
1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
tsachev@math.bas.bg

Iglika Vassileva

Sofia University
Sofia, Bulgaria
iglikav@gmail.com


References

  1. B. Annicchiarico, C. Cesaroni. Tax reforms and the underground economy: a simulation-based analysis. International Tax and Public Finance 25 (2018), 458518, doi: 10.1007/s10797-017-9450-7.
  2. Bulgarian Industrial Capital Association. Dynamics of composite index economy at light and subindex employment at light in 2020, 2021.
  3. Bulgarian National Revenue Agency. Annual report on the work of the national revenue agency for 2019, 2020.
  4. F. Busato, B. Chiarini. 2004, Market and underground activities in a two-sector dynamic equilibrium model. Econom. Theory 23, 4 (2004), 831–861, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-003-0400-5.
  5. J. de Jong, M. Ferdinandusse, J. Funda, I. Vetlov. The effect of public investment in Europe: a model-based assessment. ECB Working Paper Series, No 2021, 2017.
  6. C. Elgin, O. Öztunali.hadow economies around the world: Model based estimates. Working Papers 2012/05, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, http://ideas.econ.boun.edu.tr/RePEc/pdf/201205.pdf.
  7. European Commission. VAT gap in the EU, 2021.
  8. J. Ihrig, K. S. Moe. Lurking in the shadows: The informal sector and government policy. Journal of Development Economics 73, 2 (2004), 541–577, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387803001688.
  9. F. Schneider, J. Kepler, A. Asllani. Taxation of the informal economy in the EU: Part 1: Latest shadow economy estimates and key findings of country case studies. European Parliament, 2022, ttps://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/734007/IPOL_STU(2022)734007_EN.pdf.
  10. G. Van Rossum, F. L. Drake Jr. Python 3 Reference Manual. Scotts Valley, CA, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2009, ISBN 1441412697.
  11. I. Vassileva. Fiscal Policy Effects in an Economy with an Informal Sector. Dynamics of Socio-Economic Systems International Journal 2, 2 (2011), 217–235.